பக்கங்கள்

வியாழன், 13 டிசம்பர், 2018

GANESA’S BIRTH IS HUMBUG




Ganesa is the most prominent among the Hindu deities, and has been worshipped by all the Hindus. He is called by hundreds of names like Ganapathi, Vinayaka, Vigneswara and so on.  No Hindu can deny that Ganesa is worshipped before the beginning of any activity, and he is also worshipped before any other god.

Let us go into the affairs of Ganesa, the most recognized and the most important of all gods.

Once when Parvati Devi, the wife of Siva, was going to take bath, she wanted to post a sentry to prevent anyone from entering the bathroom. So she rolled the dirt on her body into a lump and threw it on the floor.  It became a boy, to whom Parvati gave the responsibility of guarding the bathroom.  But Siva tried to enter the room and was prevented by the dirt ball of Ganesa who told him not to enter the room.  Siva got angry, cut off Ganesa’s head with  a single sweep of his sword, and made his entry into the bathroom.  When Parvati asked him how he entered the room when there was a guard at the gate, Siva replied that he had cut of the guard’s head. When Parvati heard that her son had been killed, she started rolling on the ground and crying. Seeing this Siva tried to bring the boy back to life by joining the severed head with the body, but was dismayed to find the head missing.  Hence he cut the head of the elephant that was close by and joined it on the body of the boy, to Parvati’s satisfaction. This story seems to have its source in Siva Puranam and Kanda Puranam.


Siva and Parvati happened to see in a forest two elephants (male and female) engaged in sexual union.  This sight induced in Siva and Parvati the desire to have sex and the result was a male child with an elephant’s face.


When Parvati was pregnant, an asura assumed the form of air, entered her womb and severed the head of the child. Parvati brought the child back to life by joining an elephant’s head to the body.  This episode is said to be found in Vinayaka Puranam.


Siva is supposed to have sent his elder son Ganesa to ravage Daksha’s fire sacrifice, when Daksha cut of Ganesa’s head. Then Siva sent his second son Subramanya to carry out the task.  The son went there and saw that his elder brother had been beheaded.  As the head could not be found anywhere, the younger brother joined an elephant head to the body and brought Ganesa back to life.  This episode seems to be found in Dakkayagaparani.


A few things must be accepted.  One is that Ganesa was the son of Siva and Parvati and the other one is that the elephant head is an unnatural formation.

If the most prominent deity has so many contradictory accounts and is supposed have had a birth and an upbringing, what about the other gods?  If a god has a father and the mother, should those father and mother not have their own father and mother?  In that case how can anybody accept that the gods came into being on their own?

It follows that we have to go in search of a different origin for god and the world.

When we start discussing god, it is said that god is one, he does not have a name, a shape or a character, he created himself, he is a form of energy or he is nature.  But later, the same people create crores  and  crores of gods and fabricate cart loads of obscene stories around them.  And we make people believe in them, worship them and conduct festivals for them.  The readers should ponder over the ignorance, fraud and effort involved in all these deeds.

Let us cite one example. At Chidambaram temple there is an elephant headed Ganesa who is inserting his trunk into the genital organ of the goddess (Vallabai) seated near him.  This can be seen by anyone, daily pujas are conducterd and a number of men and women have darshan of the these deities. In some temple cars, there is a Ganesa who inserts his trunk into the organ of a girl, lifts her and keeps her suspended in the air, while she remains there with her legs wide apart.  If anybody were to question about this obscenity, a mythological story is presented by way of explanation.

It seems there was a war betwen a god and an asura, and the god went on killing all the asuras  who appeared in front of him.  But the asuras was coming in multitude like moths, from the organ of a woman.  The god sought the help of Ganesa, who put his trunk into the woman’s organ and sucked away all the asuras who were emanating  from there.  What explanation do the ‘theists’ have for all such obscenities connected with gods?

Will it be enough if we are told that they were all written by somebody in the remote past? Are those writings not treasured even today? Are such gods not worshipped with consorts and vehicles?  We request the readers to ponder over these matters.

There are people who order the reformists how they should behave, and who shout that religion and gods are in danger.  Has anyone of these people who seek popular support come farward to remove such obscenities from religion?

No ‘theist’ is worried about such matters.  And they are interested in conducting Ganesa festival on the appropriate day, and carry on research in that regard.  They keep making speeches on these obscenities. When someone points them out, he is called an ‘atheist’.  We maintain that such activities cannot protect any god or any religion.

– Chitraputran


Courtesy: Kudi Arasu – 26th August 1928
(Periyar wrote the article in the pseudoname, ‘Chitraputran’)
Translated by Prof. A. Ayyasamy

 - the modern rationalist

By | on October 1, 2018

செவ்வாய், 11 டிசம்பர், 2018

PERIYAR BREAKS PILLAYAR IDOLS

By | on October 1, 2018




In 1953, Periyar conducted an agitation of breaking the Pillayar (Ganesa) idols, the purpose for which he putforth in the following words:

“We have to eradicate the gods who are responsible for the institution which portray us as sudras, people of low birth, and some others as Brahmins of high birth.  While the former go on toiling, without any education, whereas the latter can remain without exerting themselves.  We have to break the idols of these gods.  I start with Ganesa because it is he who is worshipped before undertaking any task.”

“When I say I am going to break idols no one should think that I am going to do it inside the temples or that I will enter the temple and create a ruckus there.  No one will enter the temple.  We will either ask potters to make idols resembling the god or buy the painted ones sold in the shops.  We will publicise when and where the breaking is to take place, gather people and break them on the roadsides.  I assure that no one will remove or cause any damage to the temple idols.”

– (From periyar speech at Mangudi, 28thApril 1953)

Periyar clarifies, “There is nothing to feel surprised or hesitant about breaking Pillayar idol.  Please let me know if there were a better means of expressing our feelings, you sudra ministers, sudra members of parliament and the legislature, educators including vice chancellors, reputed millionaires, scholars, lords, former zamindars, former maharajas, Sri La Sri Heads of mutts!  I am prepared to give a patient hearing to you.”

– (From statement by Periyar, ‘Viduthalai’: 07.05.1953)

Periyar chose a day for the idol breaking agitation – 27th May, which was the birthday of Buddha.  The breaking would take place at 6.30 in the evening, he announced.  He said while breaking it, the following announcement must be made. “I am breaking it for having made me born in the low birth, and made me a sudra, a bastard.”

All through the state thousands of idols were broken. A case was filed against Periyar in the court.  In the course of enquiry, the judge Raman Nair asked, “They made Pillayar idols and they broke them.  Why do you question that?” “We had heartburn while seeing Pillayar idol being broken,” was the reply. The judge countered them, “They did not start breaking all of a sudden.  They were propagating for three months.  Why did you foolishly go where the breaking took place?  And get heartburn?”  He dismissed the case.

The religious minded people said that they were happy. “As you go on breaking the idols, the number of idols will increase.  More temples will be built.”

Periyar said, “In that case, everything is fine.  I will give you the idols at my own expense.  You break them and spare me of my strain.”

Periyar made use of the agitation to register his opposition to caste system and varnasarma and to the god who is considered to be responsible for that.

- the modern rationalist

THE RIDDLE OF KRISHNA

THE RIDDLE OF KRISHNA


By | on October 1, 2018 

Thus Spake Ambedkar




Continuation from the previous issue…

Of all the indecencies of Krishna the worst is his illicit life with one Gopi by name Radha. Krishna’s illicit relations with Radha are portrayed in the Brahmavaivarta Purana. Krishna is married to Rukmani the daughter of King Rukmangad. Radha was married to ….. Krishna who abandons his lawfully wedded wife Rukmini, and seduces Radha, wife of another man and lives with her in sin, without remorse.

Krishna was also a warrior and a politician even at a very early age, we are told, when he was in his twelfth year. Every one of his acts whether as a warrior or as a politician was an immoral act. His first act in this sphere was the assassination of his maternal uncle Kamsa. ‘Assassination’ is not too strong a term for it, for though Kamsa had given him provocation, he was not killed in the course of a battle or even in a single combat. The story is that having heard God Krishna’s youthful feats at Brindaban, Kamsa got frightened and determined to secure his death by confronting him with a great athelete in an open exhibition of arms. Accordingly he announced the celebration of a dhanuryajna a bow sacrifice, and invited Krishna, Balarama and their Gopa friends to it. Akrura, an adherent of Krishna, but an officer of Kamsa, was deputed by the latter to bring the brothers to Mathura. They came, determined to kill Kamsa. He had provoked not only them, but other Yadavas also, whom his persecution had compelled to leave Mathura. The brothers were therefore supported by a conspiracy against him. Having arrived at Mathura, they desired to change their simple Gopa dress for a more decent one, and asked for clothes from Kamsa’s washerman, whom they met in the street. As the man behaved insolently with them, they killed him and took from his stock whatever clothes they liked. They then met Kubja, a hunch-backed woman who served as Kamsa’s perfumer. At their request she annointed them with sandal paste and in return was cured by Krishna of her bodily deformity. The Bhagvata makes him visit her on a subsequent occasion and describes his union with her with its characteristic indecency. However, on the present occasion, the brothers annointed by Kubja and garlanded by Sudama, a flower-seller, entered the place of sacrifice and broke the great bow to which the sacrifice was to be offered. The frightened Kamsa sent an elephant named Kuvalayapida to kill them. Krishna killed the elephant and entered the arena. There the brothers encountered Kamsa’s chosen athletes, Chanura, Mustika, Toshalaka and Andhra. Krishna killed Chanura and Toshalaka and Balarama the other two. Frustrated in his plan of securing Krishna’s death by stratagem Kamsa ordered the brothers and their Gopa friends to be turned out and banished from his kingdom, their herds to be confiscated and Vasudeva, Nanda and his own father Ugrasen to be assassinated. At this Krishna got upon the platform on which Kamsa was seated, and seizing him by the hair, threw him down on the ground and killed him. Having consoled Kamsa’s weeping wives he ordered a royal cremation for him, and refusing the kingdom offered him by Ugrasen, installed the latter on the throne and invited his banished relatives to return to Mathura.

The next episode is Krishna’s fight with Jarasandha, emperor of Magadha, and Kalayavana. Jarasandha was the son-in-law of Kamsa. Enraged by Krishna’s assassination of Kamsa, his son-in-law, Jarasandha is said to have invaded Mathura seventeen times and to have been every time repulsed by Krishna. Fearing, however, that an eighteenth invasion would be disastrous to the city, Krishna removed the Yadavas to Dwarka at the west end of Gujarat Peninsula. After the removal of the Yadavas from Mathura, the city was besieged by Kalayavana at the instigation of Jarasandha. While pursuing the unarmed Krishna, however, out of the city, the invader was burnt to ashes, by fire issuing from the eyes of king Muchakunda, who had been sleeping in a mountain cave and whom he had awakened with a kick mistaking him for Krishna. Krishna defeated the army of Kalayavana but while flying to Dwaraka with the booty, he was overtaken by Jarasandha. He, however, evaded his enemy by climbing a hill and flying to Dwaraka after jumping down from it.

Krishna was now, for the first time, married. He married Rukmini, daughter of Bhishmaka, king of Vidarbha. Her father, at Jarasandha’s advice, was making preparations to get her married to Sishupala, Krishna’s cousin and king of Chedi. But Krishna carried her off on the day before the proposed marriage. The Bhagavata says she had fallen in love with Krishna and had addressed a love letter to him. This does not seem to be true. For Krishna did not remain a true and faithful husband of Rukmini. Rukmini was gradually followed by an enormously vast army of co-wives till the number of Krishna’s consorts rose to sixteen thousand one hundred and eight. His children numbered one lakh and eighty-thousand. The chief of his wives were the well-known eight, Rukmini, Satyabhama, Jambavati, Kalindi, Mitrabinda, Satya, Bhadra, and Lakshmana. The remaining sixteen thousand and one hundred were married to him on the same day. They belonged originally to the harem of king Naraka of Pragjyotish whom Krishna defeated and killed at the invitation of Indra, whose mother’s ear-rings had been carried away by Naraka. While paying a visit after the battle to Indra’s heaven in company with Satyabhama, this lady took fancy to Indra’s famous parijat tree. To oblige his wife, Krishna had to fight with the God whom he had just favoured. Indra, though the chief of the Vedic Gods, and though he was helped by the latter on this occasion was indeed no match for the ‘Incarnation of the Supreme Being’ and was forced to part with his favourite flower-tree, which was thus carried to Dwarka and planted there. The story of how he obtained his chief eight wives is very interesting. The story of how he got Rukmini is already told. Satyabhama was the daughter of Satyajit, a Yadava chief who gave her away in marriage to Krishna because he was afraid of him and wished to buy his favour. Jambavati was the daughter of Jambavna, a bear chief, against whom Krishna waged a long war to recover a previous gem he had taken away from a Yadava. Jambavana was defeated and presented his daughter to Krishna, as a peace-offering. Kalindi went through a series of austerities in order to get Krishna as her husband and her devotion was rewarded by the marriage she had sought. Mitrabinda was a cousin of Krishna and was carried off by him from the Svayamvara grounds. Satya was the daughter of Nagnajit, king of Ayodhya and was won by Krishna when he had achieved a brave feat of arms, namely, killing a number of naughty bulls belonging to Nagnajit. Bhadra was another cousin of Krishna and was married by him in the usual way. Lakshmana was the daughter of Brihatsena, king of Madra. and was carried off by him from the Swayamavara grounds.

Krishna’s part in Arjuna’s marriage with Subhadra, sister of Balarama and Krishna’s half sister is noteworthy. In the course of his travels Arjuna arrived at the holy place of Prabhasa, and was received by Krishna on the hill of Raivataka. There he was enamoured of Subhadra and asked Krishna how he could get her. Krishna advised him to carry her off as a brave Kshatriya without depending upon the chances of a Svayamvaram, the usual Kshatriya form of marriage. The Yadavas were at first enraged at this outrage, but when Krishna convinced them that Arjuna would be a very worthy husband for Subhadra, and that by carrying her off he had done nothing unworthy of a hero, they consented to the union. And how could they do otherwise? Krishna did not simply argue like us, poor talkers. He, as we have already seen, had backed his precepts by his example.

It is interesting to note how Krishna disposed of Jarasandha and Sishupala who created trouble at the Rajasuya performed by Yudhisthira. Jarasandha had imprisoned a large number of kings and intended to sacrifice them to Rudra. Unless he was killed and the imprisoned princes released and given an opportunity to pay homage to Yudhisthira, the latter’s claim as emperor could not be established. Krishna therefore proceeded with Bhima and Arjuna to Rajagriha, Jarasandha’s capital, and challenged him to a single combat with anyone of them he might choose. Such a challenge could not be refused by a Kshatriya, and Jarasandha, at the anticipation of death at his opponent’s hand, declared his son Sahadev as his heir apparent and chose Bhima as his opponent. The combat lasted thirteen days, and Jarasandha at length met with a painful death at his rival’s hand. Having put Sahadev on his father’s throne, and invited the released princes to attend Yudhisthira’s Rajasuya, Krishna and his friends returned to Indraprastha.

In due course the Rajasuya came off. Of the various functions and duties connected with the ceremony, Krishna is said to have taken charge of washing the feet of the Brahmans. This is a sure indication of the comparative modernness of the Mahabharata, at any rate, of this story. For in ancient times, even when the supremacy of the Brahmans had been established, the Kshatriyas never paid them any servile honour. However when the sacrifice was over, the time came for Yudhisthira to make presents to the assembled princes, priests and other persons deserving honour. To whom must honour be paid first?

Yudhisthira having asked Bhishma’s opinion on the matter, the latter replied that Krishna was the person to be honoured first. Accordingly Sahadeva at Yudhishtira’s command presented the Arghya, the mark of honour, to Krishna, and the latter accepted it. This upset Sishupala, who made a long speech, challenging Krishna’s right to the honour and abusing the Pandavas for paying any honour and Krishna for accepting it. Bhishma made another speech narrating Krishna’s exploits and achievements at length, and declaring his divinity. Sishupala rose again, rebutted Bhishma’s arguments one after another, and grossly abused him. It is pointed out by Krishna’s recent biographers, that of the charges brought against Krishna by Sishupala, there is no mention of his dealings with the Brindaban Gopis, a sure indication, according to them, that when the Mahabharatha was composed, the story of these dealings of Krishna, a story made so much of by the writers of the Puranas and the later poets, was not conceived. However, at the end of Sishupala’s speech Bhishma, who saw that Yudhishtira was afraid lest Sishupala and his followers might obstruct the completion of the ceremony, said, addressing them that if they were resolved to die they might challenge the divine Krishna himself to fight. At this Sishupala challenged Krishna, who rose in response and narrated his opponent’s numerous misdeeds. Then with the words, “At the request of his mother, my aunt, I have pardoned a hundred of Sishupala’s offences. But I cannot pardon the insulting words he has spoken of me before the assembled princes: I kill him before you all”. He threw his chakra at him and cut off his head.

Actions of Krishna during the Mahabharata War may now be reviewed. The following are some of them:

When Satyaki, Krishna’s friend, was hard pressed by Bhurisrava, son of Somadatta, Krishna induced Arjuna to cut off his arms, and thereby made it easy for Satyaki to kill him.


When Abhimanyu was unfairly surrounded and killed by seven Kaurava warriors, Arjuna vowed the death of the ring leader, Jayadratha, next day before sunset, or, failing that his own death by entering into fire. When the Sun was about to set, and Jayadratha remained unslain, Krishna miraculously hid the Sun, on which Jayadratha, having come out Krishna uncovered the Sun, and Arjuna killed Jayadratha when he was unaware.


Despairing of Drona being ever killed by fair means Krishna advised the Pandavas to kill him unfairly. If he could be made to cast down his arms, he could, Krishna said, be killed easily. This could be done if he was told that his son, Asvathama was dead. Bhima tried the suggested device. He killed an elephant named after Drona’s son and told him that Asvathama was killed. The warrior was somewhat depressed by the news, but did not quite believe it. At this juncture he was hard pressed by a number of sages to cease fighting and prepare himself for heaven with meditations worthy of a Brahmana. This checked the hero still more and he applied to the truthful Yudhisthira for correct information about his son. Finding Yudhisthira unwilling to tell a lie, Krishna overcame his reluctance by a long exhortation, in the course of which he announced his ethics of untruth in the following edifying text from Vasishtha’s Smriti.


“In marriage, in amorous dealings, when one’s life is in danger, when the whole of one’s possession is going to be lost, and when a Brahman’s interest is at stake, untruth should be told. The wise have said that speaking untruth on these five occasions is not a sin.” Yudhisthir’s scruples were stifled, and he said to his preceptor, “Yes, Asvathama is killed” adding in a low voice, “that is, an elephant” which last words, however were not heard by Dron. His depression was complete, and on hearing some bitterly reproachful words from Bhima, he gave up his arms, and while sitting in a meditative posture, was killed by Dhristhadyumna.

When Bhima was unsuccessfully fighting with Duryodhana by the side of the Dvaipayana Lake Krishna reminded him through Arjuna that he had vowed the breaking of his opponent’s thighs. Now striking a rival below the navel was unfair, but as Duryodhana could not be killed except by such an unfair means, Krishna advised Bhima to adopt the same and Bhima did.”


The death of Krishna throws a flood of light on his morals. Krishna died as the Ruler of Dwaraka. What was this Dwaraka like and what sort of death awaited him?

In founding his city of Dwaraka he had taken care to settle thousands of ‘unfortunates’ there. As the Harivamsa said : ‘O, hero having conquerred the abodes of the Daityas (giants) with the help of brave Yadus, the Lord settled thousands of public women in Dwaraka”. Dancing, singing and drinking by men and women married and prostitutes filled the city of Dwaraka. We get a description of a sea trip in which these women formed a principal source of enjoyment. Excited by their singing and dancing, the brothers Krishna and Balarama joined in the dancing with their wives. They were followed by the other Yadava chiefs and by Arjuna and Narada. Then a fresh excitement was sought. Men and women all fell into the sea and at Krishna’s suggestion, the gentlemen began a jalakrida water sport, with the ladies, Krishna leading one party, and Balarama another, while the courtesans added to the amusement by their music. This was followed by eating and drinking and this again by a special musical performance in which the leaders themselves exhibited their respective skill in handling various musical instruments. It will thus be seen what a jolly people these Yadavas were, and with what contempt they would have treated the objections urged nowadays by the Brahmans and such other purists against nautch parties and the native theatres. It was in one of these revels—a drunken revel—that the Yadavas were destroyed. They, it is said, had incurred the displeasure of a number of sages by a childish trick played on the latter by some of their boys. These boys disguised Samba, one of Krishna’s sons, as a woman with child, tying an iron pestle below his navel, and asked the sages to say what child the ‘woman’ would give birth to. The enraged sage said ‘she’ would produce an iron pestle which would be the ruin of the Yadavas. Fearing the worst consequences from this curse, the boys took the pestle to the sea-side and rubbed it away. But its particles came out in the form of erakas, a kind of reeds and its last remaining bit, which had been thrown into the sea, was afterwards recovered and used by a hunter as the point of an arrow; Now it was with these erakas that the Yadavas killed themselves. They had gone in large parties to the holy place of Prabhasa. They indulged in drinking there and this proved their ruin. The evils of drinking there had been found out at length by Krishna and some other Yadava leaders, and it was prohibited on pain of death by a public notification. But the prohibition had no effect. The drunken Yadavas at first quarrelled and then began to fight and kill one another. When some of Krishna’s own sons were killed he himself joined in the fight and killed a large number of his own people. He then went in search of Balarama. He found him in meditative posture and saw his spirit passing out of his body in the form of a large serpent i.e., Sesha Naga, the divine snake whom he had incarnated. Krishna now felt that it was time for him also to pass away. He then bade farewell to his father and his wives, telling them that he had sent for Arjuna, who would take charge of them. Then he seated himself under a tree, hidden by its leafy and outstretching branches, and composed his mind in meditation. While thus sitting, a hunter named Jara mistook him for a deer and hit him with an arrow, one pointed with the last remaining bit of the fatal pestle. Discovering his mistake, the man fell at Krishna’s feet and was pardoned and flew away to heaven, illumining all sides by its dazzling light. Arjuna came and proceeded towards Hastinapur with the surviving Yadavas—men and women. But his good genius having left him he had lost the power of his hitherto mighty arm and his unrivalled skill as an archer. A number of Ahiras, armed only with lathis, attacked his party and carried off many of the women, and he reached Hastinapur only with a small remnant. After Arjuna’s departure the sea engulfed Dwaraka, and nothing was left to speak of the Yadavas, their glories, their domestic broils and their revels.

to be continued….

Source: ‘Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Writings and Speeches’ Volume IV, Riddles of Rama and Krishna, published by the Government of Maharashtra, 1987
- the modern rationalist

 

THE RIDDLE OF KRISHNA

By | on November 1, 2018 

Continuation from the previous issue…

Yudhisthira having asked Bhishma’s opinion on the matter, the latter replied that Krishna was the person to be honoured first. Accordingly Sahadeva at Yudhishtira’s command presented the Arghya, the mark of honour, to Krishna, and the latter accepted it. This upset Sishupala, who made a long speech, challenging Krishna’s right to the honour and abusing the Pandavas for paying any honour and Krishna for accepting it. Bhishma made another speech narrating Krishna’s exploits and achievements at length, and declaring his divinity. Sishupala rose again, rebutted Bhishma’s arguments one after another, and grossly abused him. It is pointed out by Krishna’s recent biographers, that of the charges brought against Krishna by Sishupala, there is no mention of his dealings with the Brindaban Gopis, a sure indication, according to them, that when the Mahabharatha was composed, the story of these dealings of Krishna, a story made so much of by the writers of the Puranas and the later poets, was not conceived. However, at the end of Sishupala’s speech Bhishma, who saw that Yudhishtira was afraid lest Sishupala and his followers might obstruct the completion of the ceremony, said, addressing them that if they were resolved to die they might challenge the divine Krishna himself to fight. At this Sishupala challenged Krishna, who rose in response and narrated his opponent’s numerous misdeeds. Then with the words, “At the request of his mother, my aunt, I have pardoned a hundred of Sishupala’s offences. But I cannot pardon the insulting words he has spoken of me before the assembled princes: I kill him before you all”. He threw his chakra at him and cut off his head.

Actions of Krishna during the Mahabharata War may now be reviewed. The following are some of them:

  1. When Satyaki, Krishna’s friend, was hard pressed by Bhurisrava, son of Somadatta, Krishna induced Arjuna to cut off his arms, and thereby made it easy for Satyaki to kill him.
  2. When Abhimanyu was unfairly surrounded and killed by seven Kaurava warriors, Arjuna vowed the death of the ring leader, Jayadratha, next day before sunset, or, failing that his own death by entering into fire. When the Sun was about to set, and Jayadratha remained unslain, Krishna miraculously hid the Sun, on which Jayadratha, having come out Krishna uncovered the Sun, and Arjuna killed Jayadratha when he was unaware.
  3. Despairing of Drona being ever killed by fair means Krishna advised the Pandavas to kill him unfairly. If he could be made to cast down his arms, he could, Krishna said, be killed easily. This could be done if he was told that his son, Asvathama was dead. Bhima tried the suggested device. He killed an elephant named after Drona’s son and told him that Asvathama was killed. The warrior was somewhat depressed by the news, but did not quite believe it. At this juncture he was hard pressed by a number of sages to cease fighting and prepare himself for heaven with meditations worthy of a Brahmana. This checked the hero still more and he applied to the truthful Yudhisthira for correct information about his son. Finding Yudhisthira unwilling to tell a lie, Krishna overcame his reluctance by a long exhortation, in the course of which he announced his ethics of untruth in the following edifying text from Vasishtha’s Smriti.

“In marriage, in amorous dealings, when one’s life is in danger, when the whole of one’s possession is going to be lost, and when a Brahman’s interest is at stake, untruth should be told. The wise have said that speaking untruth on these five occasions is not a sin.” Yudhisthir’s scruples were stifled, and he said to his preceptor, “Yes, Asvathama is killed” adding in a low voice, “that is, an elephant” which last words, however were not heard by Dron. His depression was complete, and on hearing some bitterly reproachful words from Bhima, he gave up his arms, and while sitting in a meditative posture, was killed by Dhristhadyumna.

  1. When Bhima was unsuccessfully fighting with Duryodhana by the side of the Dvaipayana Lake Krishna reminded him through Arjuna that he had vowed the breaking of his opponent’s thighs. Now striking a rival below the navel was unfair, but as Duryodhana could not be killed except by such an unfair means, Krishna advised Bhima to adopt the same and Bhima did.”

The death of Krishna throws a flood of light on his morals. Krishna died as the Ruler of Dwaraka. What was this Dwaraka like and what sort of death awaited him?

In founding his city of Dwaraka he had taken care to settle thousands of ‘unfortunates’ there. As the Harivamsa said : ‘O, hero having conquerred the abodes of the Daityas (giants) with the help of brave Yadus, the Lord settled thousands of public women in Dwaraka”. Dancing, singing and drinking by men and women married and prostitutes filled the city of Dwaraka. We get a description of a sea trip in which these women formed a principal source of enjoyment. Excited by their singing and dancing, the brothers Krishna and Balarama joined in the dancing with their wives. They were followed by the other Yadava chiefs and by Arjuna and Narada. Then a fresh excitement was sought. Men and women all fell into the sea and at Krishna’s suggestion, the gentlemen began a jalakrida water sport, with the ladies, Krishna leading one party, and Balarama another, while the courtesans added to the amusement by their music. This was followed by eating and drinking and this again by a special musical performance in which the leaders themselves exhibited their respective skill in handling various musical instruments. It will thus be seen what a jolly people these Yadavas were, and with what contempt they would have treated the objections urged nowadays by the Brahmans and such other purists against nautch parties and the native theatres. It was in one of these revels—a drunken revel—that the Yadavas were destroyed. They, it is said, had incurred the displeasure of a number of sages by a childish trick played on the latter by some of their boys. These boys disguised Samba, one of Krishna’s sons, as a woman with child, tying an iron pestle below his navel, and asked the sages to say what child the ‘woman’ would give birth to. The enraged sage said ‘she’ would produce an iron pestle which would be the ruin of the Yadavas. Fearing the worst consequences from this curse, the boys took the pestle to the sea-side and rubbed it away. But its particles came out in the form of erakas, a kind of reeds and its last remaining bit, which had been thrown into the sea, was afterwards recovered and used by a hunter as the point of an arrow; Now it was with these erakas that the Yadavas killed themselves. They had gone in large parties to the holy place of Prabhasa. They indulged in drinking there and this proved their ruin. The evils of drinking there had been found out at length by Krishna and some other Yadava leaders, and it was prohibited on pain of death by a public notification. But the prohibition had no effect. The drunken Yadavas at first quarrelled and then began to fight and kill one another. When some of Krishna’s own sons were killed he himself joined in the fight and killed a large number of his own people. He then went in search of Balarama. He found him in meditative posture and saw his spirit passing out of his body in the form of a large serpent i.e., Sesha Naga, the divine snake whom he had incarnated. Krishna now felt that it was time for him also to pass away. He then bade farewell to his father and his wives, telling them that he had sent for Arjuna, who would take charge of them. Then he seated himself under a tree, hidden by its leafy and outstretching branches, and composed his mind in meditation. While thus sitting, a hunter named Jara mistook him for a deer and hit him with an arrow, one pointed with the last remaining bit of the fatal pestle. Discovering his mistake, the man fell at Krishna’s feet and was pardoned and flew away to heaven, illumining all sides by its dazzling light. Arjuna came and proceeded towards Hastinapur with the surviving Yadavas—men and women. But his good genius having left him he had lost the power of his hitherto mighty arm and his unrivalled skill as an archer. A number of Ahiras, armed only with lathis, attacked his party and carried off many of the women, and he reached Hastinapur only with a small remnant. After Arjuna’s departure the sea engulfed Dwaraka, and nothing was left to speak of the Yadavas, their glories, their domestic broils and their revels.

Concluded

Source: ‘Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Writings and Speeches’ Volume IV, Riddles of Rama and Krishna, published by the Government of Maharashtra, 1987

-  the modern rationalist

NO ‘THALIS’ FOR WOMEN IN THIS ‘SELF-RESPECT’ VILLAGE




Arjunan and Thaniarasu who were the first self-respect marriage couple of Chikkedikuppam village, looking at the register book that records such marriages


Shanmugasundaram J


In a state that for long took pride in wearing the Dravidian ideology on its sleeve, the 4,000 families of Chikkedikuppam and other villages – located 60 km from Villupuram, Tamil Nadu – revere Dravidar Kazhagam founder and rationalist Periyar E.V. Ramasamy in more ways than one.

For close to half a century, the villagers have shunned caste, dowry and all forms of superstitions. The married women of Chikkedikuppam and its surrounding villages in the panchayats of Kottapundi, Kottugankuppam, Athianthal and Kovilpuraiyur, do not wear mangalsutras (thali), reflecting the Dravidian concept of self-respect marriages.

“More than a 1,000 couples in and around Chikkedikuppam got married by signing an agreement.  No bride-groom demands or takes dowry from the bride and her family.  In fact, dowry is something unheard of in the village in the last 50 years,” said 85-year-old Arjunan of the village.  Arjunan and his wife Thaniarasu was the first couple to have gone through such a self respect marriage.  They entered into wedlock on January 7, 1968, particularly choosing the day as it was considered inauspicious.

“The couples are leading a happy life, with children and grandchildren.  Women are given more importance in our families,” said Arjunan’s son Periyar, who runs a school named E.V. Ramasamy.

They have also been naming their children with typical Tamil names – Thendral, ‘Viduthalai’ Virumpi, Mathiazhagan, Thamilthendral, Senthamil Kanini and Thenarasu.  Many of the women, men and youngsters in the village have mastered the martial art of Silambam, turning to it to lead a disciplined way of life.

It all started during the 1960s.  Then, Chikkedikuppam had a dark side to it.  Brewing and selling of arrack was rampant, and many women had lost their husbands to it, recall villagers.

“We desperately looked for ways to wean our men from it.  It was then that we attended a meeting addressed by Periyar at Malaiyanur.  We were moved by his speech, and decided to follow and spread his ideas for self-discipline, gender equality and to do away with caste discrimination,” said N Kathavarayan, who is in his 70s.  He was known as rationalist singer (pagutharivu padakar)during the time and along with other followers of Periyar, propagated his ideologies through dramas.

Source: ‘The Times of India’
The modern rationalist
By | on November 2, 2018

ADI DRAVIDA SELF RESPECT CONFERENCE




We are happy about a significant resolution passed in the Adi Dravida Self Respect Conference held at Nepier Park, Chennai, yesterday (20 July 1929).

“Our large community of six and a half crores of people has been included in Hindu religion, as a result of which we remain untouchables, deprived of equality.  Hence this conference resolves to beseech the government and the legislators not to record our religion as Hinduism and to remove us from the list of Hinduism from all the government documents.”

About three years ago a resolution was passed to the same effect in the conference of SNDP Elava people which was convened at Mudukulathur of Travancore Princely State.  It has resolved that those people must go to some other religion leaving Hinduism, as there was so human freedom in that religion.

Knowing that such a resolution was in the offing, some Christian missionaries, Buddhist luminaries and Arya Samajist attended the (SNDP) conference and propounded the strong points of their own religions.

The SNDP meeting was attended by E.V.Ramasami who said, while supporting the resolution, that there was no immediate need for going to any other religion and we could wait and see for some more time.  If conversion was in fact necessary then the proper choice would be Islam as right then people were afraid only of Mohammedans, among all people.  In that religion all rights were protected except in the case of women.  Christianity in our country was gradually becoming like Brahminic religion, since caste distinctions were observed in it.  Arya Samaj was nothing but another form of Brahminism.  Though Bhuddhist principles were decidedly better than those of any other religion, at present only Islam had the capacity to control Brahminism to assure real freedom to the people of our country.

When there is no religion called Hinduism, it is improper to call people by that name.  When that is the case, using the name and denying human rights along with the rights to use temples, water sources, streets and schools is the most unjust and unfair practice.


It was decided, as per his advice, that there was no immediate need for conversion.

Now, the Adi Dravida Conference too has resolved to get away from Hindu religion though not to join any other religion. Some people may ask how to call them in that case.  There is no need for them to have any distinct name.  If need be, they may be called Indians.  If it were be pointed out they had to be registered under some name, the 65 crores of untouchables could be called non-Hindus just as 20 crores of people who are known as Hindus are politically referred to as non-Mahammedam.

When there are non-Brahmins and non-Mohammedans, heavens would not fall if there were to be group of people called non Hindus.   No disgrace would be caused to them on that account.  At any rate, we feel that the disgrace cannot be greater than what is caused by being called Hindus.  When there is no religion called Hinduism, it is improper to call people by that name.  When that is the case, using the name and denying human rights along with the rights to use temples, water sources, streets and schools is the most unjust and unfair practice.

Some people contend that we are alone in stating that there is no religion called Hinduism because of a lack of knowledge and induced by our hatred for Brahmins.  But let us see what K. Subramania Pillai, a bilingual scholar in English and Tamil, veteran in religious scholarship, and a man of sharp intellect, has uttered on this point in Sentamil Selvi (Tamil monthly) seven or eight years ago.

“The first point people have to etch firmly in their minds is that there is no religion called Hinduism.

The Persian word ‘Hindu’ which denoted the residents of Sindhu valley was changed to Indus by the Greeks and was used by all westerners to denote the people of the land; the land itself was called India.  The Word Hindu is not found either in Tamil or in Sanskrit.

Only those who have no knowledge whatsoever of religions will call their religion ‘Hindu Religion’  just as European, American or English stands for the civilization of those people and not for their religion, the word Hindu stands for the civilization of the people spread from Himalayas upto Cape Comerin, and not for their religion.  Swami Vivekananda also has expressed the same opinion in many of his speeches.  A religion will be named after its deity, the chief prophet or its scriptures.  Christianity and Mahammedanism are named after their prophets.  Buddhism or Arugathan also follow suit.  But the word Hinduism does not denote any religious ideas.”  Pillai has confirmed that Swami Vivekananda is of the same opinion.  It is not clear how long we should tolerate the vandalisation of 20 crores of people and a prosperous country in the name of a nonexistent religion and opportunistic policies to suit selfishness of the rulers.

On another occasion Brahmin called Dr. S. Subramania Ayyar observed in his own paper, Commonweal.

“If the present condition of the Hindu people is pondered on the dilapidated and disorderly construction of Hindu religion cannot be used by carrying out repairs here and there and supported with props.

It must be mercilessly demolished and flattened, and another non ostentatious building suitable for the present day use and needs, can be reacted in its place.  That seems to be best thing to do.”

Many more researchers are of the same view.  When this is the case, how many people who are witnessing a fake religion standing in the way of such tasks like stopping child marriages’, acquiring the right for all people to walk on the streets, preventing prostitution carried on in the temples in the name of gods and to stop children being pushed into the bedroom, can be honest courageous and honourable?

Therefore when the Adi Dravidas demand that they should not be recorded as Hindus, we too are in the need for taking such a stand.  If we agree to be recorded as Hindus, we get the title of sudras which lower us to that of Adi Dravidas.  No reformist, or legislator or leader of the society is known to have taken any steps to get rid of the disgrace.  There are people who cry hoarse “Faith is gone, god is gone, religion has gone, mythology is gone,” all to get small rewards, but no one with real human qualities who will say, “Self respect is gone! Human rights are gone, we have become lower than animals” and try to restore human dignity.  Hence it is our belief that soon the day will come when we too will demand to be freed from the shackles of Hinduism just as Adi Dravida brethren are doing now.

Sub Editorial, ‘Kudi Arasu’, 21st July 1929 

Translated by : Prof. A. Ayyasamy

-  the modern rationalist, 1.12.18

வியாழன், 29 நவம்பர், 2018

பிரான்சு மாணவி தமிழர் தலைவரைச் சந்தித்தார்

பிரான்சு நாட்டிலிருந்து முதுகலை அரசியல் அறிவியல் பட்டப் படிப்புப் பயிற்சிக்கு சென்னைப் பல்கலைக்கழகம் வந்துள்ள மாணவி யுலைலி ஹர்ஸ் சென்னை - பெரியார் திடலுக்கு வருகை தந்து தமிழர் தலைவரைச் சந்தித்தார். 'பெண் விடுதலை' பற்றிய பெரியாரின் கருத்துகளை உள்ளடக்கிய ஆங்கிலக் கட்டுரையினை தமிழர் தலைவரிடம் அளித்தார்.

உடன் பெரியார் மணியம்மை அறிவியல் மற்றும் தொழில்நுட்ப நிறுவன தொடர்பாளர் அமுதரசன் மற்றும் சென்னைப் பல்கலைக்கழக முதுகலைப் பட்ட மாணவர்கள். மேலும் பேராசிரியர் முனைவர் நம்.சீனி வாசன், கழகப் பொதுச் செயலாளர் வீ.அன்புராஜ், வெளியுறவுச் செயலாளர் வீ.குமரேசன் உள்ளனர் (சென்னை, 27.11.2018)

-  விடுதலை நாளேடு, 28.11.18
viduthalai daily paper

திங்கள், 26 நவம்பர், 2018

Thanthai Periyar CASTE EXTREMINATION DAY November 26 1957

November 26 (1957)

Thanthai Periyar CASTE EXTREMINATION DAY November 26 1957

It was on 26th November 1957, as per the dictates of Thanthai Periyar, cadres of Dravidar Kazhagam burnt the provisions of Indian Constitution that upholds caste, which is a stigma to our society.

Nearly 10,000 DK members participated throughout Tamilnadu. Police arrested 3000 cadres that includes, ladies, children, old aged persons. They were also sentenced to rigorous imprisonment upto three years. None of them opted for bail. Some of them died in the prison.

In the history of India, this was single largest protest against casteism. Only Periyar movement did that.

Some of us may think that the Indian Constitution was drafted by Dr.Babasaheb B.R.Ambedkar. But on 3.9.1953, Dr.Ambedkar spoke in Rajya Sabha that he will be the first person to burn Indian Constitution.

What Dr.Ambedkar spoke, Periyar and his followers did.
Let us on this day of 26th November, pledge ourselves to engage in eradication of caste in our life time.
- TAta sivaish, pace book, 26.11.17

செவ்வாய், 4 செப்டம்பர், 2018

75TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE OF THE DRAVIDIAN STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION

HISTORIC RESOLUTIONS COVERINING VARIOUS FACETS OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL LIFE OF THE COUNTRY PASSED IN THE 75TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE OF THE DRAVIDIAN STUDENTS’ ASSOCIATION


Please follow and like us:
    1. Education and the Responsibility of the Government
    The first generation learners of the backward and the depressed classes and the rural people who have been deprived of education for generations should be treated liberally in sanction of loans by banks. Since education will help them lay a strong foundation for their life, they must be encouraged in every respect to get education.
    1. Sports as Essential as Education
    (a)  It is rank Brahminism to take it that education ends with bookish learning. Sports and games also form part of education. Schools without playgrounds must be denied recognition. Marks must be allotted for proficiency in sports and must be added to the total.
    (b)  Because it is sponsored by the Brahmins, the gambling game of cricket has pushed all other games behind. The Indian game of hockey is lagging behind for want of governmental support. It is shameful that India with its 1300 crores of people could not qualify itself to participate in the world soccer competitions. The education system of India should be suitably amended, giving due importance to sports and games.
    1. Change in the Syllabus
    Section 51A(h) of the Constitution of India enjoins the development of scientific temper and reformist attitude. Hence all those parts like mythology and itihasas which foster superstition must be removed from the syllabus and a curriculum that develops scientific temper must be drafted. Besides the system that encourages learning by rote must be brought to an end.
    1. The entry ‘Education’ must be Restored to the State List. National Eligibility cum Entrance Test must be Abolished
    This conference strongly feels that in a country like India with different curriculum, and teaching learning methods, selecting candidates for professional course through a single entrance examination is unfair and partial. The Central Government must restore ‘education’ to the State List. State governments also must take steps in this regard.
    It is pointed out with agony that for the two years students of the poor and the downtrodden and the rural folk have been denied admission to the medical courses as a result of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). It is suspected whether the government and the judiciary have jointly perpetuated this injustice on the oppressed lot of people. Not only for medical courses, but all entrance examinations which give room to robbery by coaching centres must be abolished.
    (a)  The step to replace U.G.C. with HECI by the Central Government condemned. Steps to privatise and globalise education must be given up. The attention of the students, parents and teachers is drawn to the agreement with WTO to commercialise education and the conspiracy to close the doors of social justice which call for concerted opposition to the sinister moves.
    (b)  It is resolved to oppose tooth and nail the steps to bring the universities under the control of the Central Government in the name of standardisation and pave the way for international commercialisation of education.
    (c)  All the social forums must combine to thwart the attempts of the RSS to introduce its ideology into education. Appreciation to all the outfits which are opposing the anti-educational activities of the Central and the State Governments.
    1. The Responsibility of the Students
    (a)  Students must take it as their full time responsibility to enlighten people through websites on the liberation of the Tamil race and its development, cessation of Aryan domination, safeguarding social justice and upholding human rights.
    (b)  Must distribute booklets published by the Dravidar Kazhagam among fellow students.
    (c)  Should keep themselves away from addictions and other immoral acts, keep their attention focussed on social purpose, welfare of the family and future progress.
    (d)  Must disseminate Periyar Thought through ‘Notice Boards’ fixed at strategic points.
    (e)  Must form branches of Dravidar Kazhagam in every educational institution to strive for formation of a socialist democratic society.
    (f)   It is only through the efforts of our great leaders that our society which had been deprived of education has started getting education and is on the way to progress. Students are, therefore, beseeched not to be misled, but to concentrate on education and work for overall prosperity. Parents, teachers, leaders and the media are requested to offer their co-operation in this respect.
    (g)  While getting married, caste, religion and rituals must be eschewed and priority for life pair must be given to widows, widowers or divorcees.
    (h)  Wherever untouchability is followed or communal clashes arise, the Association must go there to find a solution.
    1. Delayed distribution of Scholarships and Incentives Amounts to Malpractice
    Various research scholarships and incentives offered by the Central Government are inordinately delayed causing enormous mental strain to the recipients, for most of whom it is a matter of life and death. The Central and the State Governments are requested to ensure timely payment of these amouts.
    (a) Reduction by the State Government of the scholarship paid to the Adi Dravida students pursuing engineering education increases their burden and causes difficulties. The relevant G.O. must be withdrawn and the entire amount must be paid by the Government.
    1. Various Entrance Examinations Cause Misery to the State Board and Rural Students
    Examinations like CBSE – NET, CSIR-NET, ASRB-TECT, which had hitherto been conducted by UGC have been transferred to CBSE. Conduct of these examinations cause havoc to those who studied in the State Board, and all the rural candidates. They are much helpful to the candidates from the North. It is felt that after having completed two years in a teacher training institution, TET is unnecessary and hence may be discontinued forthwith. This recommendation is made in the interest of social justice and state rights.
    1. Greater Priority to Social Justice, 
      Extend to Private Sector
    Though reservation policy is professed to be followed in respect of the depressed and the hill tribes it is not distributed in the proper proportion in education and employment, which is against the constitutional requirement. This must be set right and those responsible for it must be punished. The exemption from reservation given to certain departments must be withdrawn and must necessarily be extended upto the Supreme Court level. No factor like ‘creamy layer’ which dilute the principle of social justice must be introduced. Since private sector and international sector are growing fast, reservation must be introduced in the private sector also to ensure social justice. While reservation in promotion to the depressed classes is welcome it may be extended to the backward classes also.
    1. Denial of Women’s Rights
    50 per cent reservation must be given to women in education and employment. The Bill providing 33 per cent reservation for women in elected bodies which has been pending since 1996 may be passed immediately, failing which women may consider boycotting elections altogether.
    1. Self Imposition of Discipline
    Student Members of the Association must follow self discipline and respect laws of the country. Traffic rules to be followed and helmets to be used. Must keep away from all addictions and consumerist culture. Must maintain punctuality, simplicity, frugality and follow all tenets of Periyarism.
    1. Eradication of Untouchability to Start from Temple Sanctum Santorum
    Appointment of temple priests on the basis of caste and not permitting other caste people to touch the temple idols are yet another form of untouchability. The law may be amended to accommodate a properly trained person of any community becoming a temple priest. It is basically wrong to keep in abeyance the already passed Act in Tamil Nadu Assembly to appoint persons of all communities as temple priest.
    1. Place for Tamil in Act Apprentice Training and Examination at BHEL
    The Act Apprentice examination conducted in BHEL, Trichy and Ranipet, after the training used to be held in Tamil upto 2016 and afterwards only in Hindi and English causing enormous hardship to the Tamils who are mostly from the depressed and indigent families.
    Even the small percentage of candidates who passed got only poor marks, making it impossible for them even to apply for any all India Examinations. The Central Government may kindly restore the practice obtained till 2016 and conduct the examination in Tamil.
    1. Spreading Movement’s Propaganda Literature and Periodicals
    Members of Dravidian Students’ Association and the Youth Wing must take up collection of subscriptions for ‘Viduthalai’ as it means dissemination of Periyarism.
    The Government of Tamil Nadu which had been distributing ‘Viduthalai’, ‘Unmai’, ‘The Modern Rationalist’ and ‘Periyar Pinju’ to Government libraries has discontinued the practice on account of political misunderstanding. The practice may be renewed since those magazines are dedicated to spreading ideals like secularism, social justice, eradication of untouchability, eradication of casteism and eradication of womens’ servility.
    1. Remove Pavement Temples
    (a)  In spite of the firm decree by the Supreme Court on 14th October 2010, that all the numerous (77, 450) pavement temples must be removed, the Government of Tamil Nadu has not done anything to implement it for more than eight years and rendered itself open to contempt of court proceedings. The Government is warned that failure to comply with the court order will have to face a contempt of court case.
    (b)  The practice of putting up places of worship within Tamil Nadu Government office complexes continues contrary to the High Court Madurai Bench order dated 17th March 2010, and also conducting pujas and the like in the offices. The government may implement the said order of the court, failing which it will have to face contempt of court proceedings.
    (c)  It is pointed out that it is the duty of the Government of Tamil Nadu to prevent any religious practice which is harmful to people’s life and health.
    1. State Level Propaganda
    A propaganda programme to enlighten people on Section 51A(h) of the Constitution will be undertaken throughout Tamil Nadu in two phases under the leadership of the President, Dravidar Kazhagam. The first phase of 22nd August to 28th August 2018 will cover from Nagercoil to Villupuram and the second phase of 1st September to 9thSeptember 2018 will start at Ariyalur and conclude in Chennai.
    1. Bring Down BJP Rule
    The NDA government headed by Modi at the Centre has to be brought down for the following reasons:
    (a)  Activities against Secularism enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The term ‘Secular’ has been purposely removed in Government Advertisements. With a religious minded attitude, fostering mythology and superstition, Hindu religious policy of cow worship is given prominence in the name of cow protection. Beef eating banned. Violence instigated against minorities.
    (b)  Examinations like NEET, NET, TET, will nullify the dispensation of social justice. Retrograde Varnasrama type of education, saffronisation of education, imposition of Hindi, imposition of Sanskrit and steps to foster Hindutva are encouraged under BJP rule.
    (c)  Violence instigated against the depressed and the tribals. Sexual violence against women.
    (d)  The election promise of 2 crores of employment per year remains unfulfilled.
    (e)  Great fall in economic front. Inflation caused by GST and other taxes. Small and tiny industries are destroyed. Increase in unemployment. Government supportive of corporate and god men.
    (f)   Neglect of agriculture leading to suicide of farmers. Denial of labour rights.
    (g)  Appointing RSS men as Governors in the non BJP ruled states, and encouraging them to indulge in anti-democratic activities.
    (h)  Interference in the working of Election Commission and Judiciary.
    (i)   Imposing projects like methane, hydro-carbon, sterlite and neutrino which are harmful to the people against the will of the people, trampling on the states’ rights just in order to favour the corporates.
    (j)   Taking a partial stand in river water disputes with ulterior political motives. Peoples’ agitations for rights being crushed with the help of State governments and police. Branding rights activists as terrorists. Invoking national security for incarcerating them.
    (k)  A Prime Minister with fascist attitude who refuses to meet even State Chief Ministers, elected by the mandate of the people.
    This Conference calls upon all the voters to get together with a determination to defeat the BJP in a decisive manner in the 2019 parliamentary elections. All the non party people, students and women must actively participate in this endeavour.
    It is also recommended that the State Government which functions at the behest of the Central BJP Government must also be brought down.
    1. Censure to the Centre that conspires against Tamil Nadu in Archaeological Research
    Archaeological research was undertaken at Adichanallur as early as 1876 by the British government, but the report is not yet released.
    The research undertaken at Keeladi, Sivagangai District, has been abruptly stopped.
    We are convinced that the Centre acts with an Aryan-Brahministic attitude to stall all this research, since it might be proved that the Dravidian civilization is greater and older than Aryan civilization.
    We urge continuance of research at Keeladi and publication of official reports in this regard.
    Even after the civilization of Mohenjo Daro and Harappa has been conclusively proved as Dravidian, attempts are made to dub it as Aryan by planting spurious evidences. Calling it ‘Hindu’ Civilization by Mohan Bhagavat of RSS is a conspiracy, and is to be condemned.
    1. Censure to the Murder of Rationalists
    Assassination of rationalist thinkers like Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Bansare, Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh by bigoted reactionaries is condemned. Equally reprehensible is the delay in apprehending the perpetrators and getting them punished. The Central and the State Governments should act fast avoiding further delay.
    1. Vow on Future Programme
    Factors like caste, untouchability, subjugation of women, bigotry, terrorism, attitude to encourage corporate oriented economy, moral degeneration, gender inequality, dire poverty, appalling inequality and unbridled exploitation, have wrecked the Indian society. The remedy lies in introducing values like socialism, equality and fraternity which will unite the entire humanity as a single family. It can be brought about only though rationalism sans religion and the concept of universal brotherhood formulated by Thanthai Periyar. We vow to take this philosophy of human rights all over the world to ensure peace and prosperity.
     By | on August 1, 2018Logo

    LUNAR ECLIPS 2018

    y10

    Please follow and like us:
       OPEN FEAST TO BREAK THE MYTH OF ‘NON-DINING’
      The Rationalists’ Forum, a functional wing of Periyar Movement organized an Open Space Family Feast of Rationalists and Progressive persons, on 27th July 2018 at Periyar Thidal, Chennai on the occasion of Lunar Eclipse.
      The rare event of Lunar Eclipse 2018, the longest one duration wise – full eclipse of 1 hour 43 minutes, which occurred 152 years back will occur in future only after 10 years. The rare occasion was utilized as scientific facts propaganda cum informative and meaningful entertainment event.
      The inaugural session started with a brief narration of how lunar eclipse and solar eclipse occur and the astronomical facts behind them. How did astronomical scientists face stiff resistance and fatal end during the past for their advocacy of ‘heliocentric’ universe instead of ‘geocentric’ as narrated in religious texts? The myth behind the religious belief was shackled to make it as the popular belief that is factual too. As a part of the event, the portraits of scientists – Eratosthenes (276 – 194 BCE), Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), Giordano Bruno (1548-1600), Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Isaac Newton (1643-1727) were unveiled as a mark of respect. A brief note of their contributions was also explained by speakers.
      Afterwards, games with scientific explanation were introduced for the children to play. Video clippings of man landing on the Moon for the first time in 1969 and of the folk cultural event of breaking the myth and superstitions as prevailed at the time of landing were displayed as replay of the then popular Tamil feature film. Personalities who have been contributing to the cause of teaching science and development of scientific temper were felicitated. Many from the audience were invited to sing songs on the eradication of superstitions and other rationalist themes.
      When the lunar eclipse commenced at 11.44 p.m. (midnight) of 27th July 2018, all the members participated in the joint open space feast to break the myth of ‘dining not to be undertaken while the eclipse endures’. Simultaneously the members were viewing, through the installed telescopes, the stages of lunar eclipse occurrence. Till the early morning of 28th July upto 2.30 a.m. the event of entertaining the people with explanation of scientific facts went on. The audience also listened to the special lecture given by Dr. K.Veeramani, Patron, The Rationalists’ Forum on Meaningless Mythology on Natural Astronomical Occurrence’ in a jovial as well as enlightening manner. Over all the attended audience enjoyed the event. The Rationalists’ Forum co-ordinated the event along with the Forum of Revolving Earth.
      By | on August 1, 2018Logo

      GUIDING DRAVIDIAN STUDENTS IN PROPER PATH!


      Please follow and like us:
        Dr.K.Veeramani
        Kumbakonam (Tamil Nadu) has been a bastion of the Dravidian Movement since the days of Self Respect Movement. The momentous Dravidian Students’ Conference to mark the completion of 75 years of the Students Movement proved to be unique in more ways than one. The following is a synopsis of the Valedictory Address delivered by Asiriyar K.Veeramani,  President, Dravidar Kazhagam on 8th July 2018.
        Even the birth in the year 1943 of Dravidian Students’ Association was turbulent, being born out of an agitation. Every event in the conference was in keeping with the tradition of the Dravidian Movement. The rally in the evening established that our youth are marching in the right direction. In all the events of the day, the poets’ forum, symposium and seminar, their reach was unparalleled, proving that they had been breathing Periyar all along and no one, however big and powerful they might be, could do anything to undermine the Movement, which would stay forever in the land of Periyar as an unshakeable presence. Let it be the Dravidian political wing or the social wing like our Dravidar Kazhagam, no opponent however powerful or influential they might be, can succeed in shaking it.
        There was a time when elders used to teach the youth. But in this age of electronics we have to seek their help in operating the modern gadgets. They have become capable of imparting lessons to us. All that we have to do to them is to guide them to the proper path.
        Just as these youngsters, I was hoisted on a table in my eleventh or twelfth year by my teacher Dravidamani and made to speak. It was in 1943, in a meeting at Cuddalore meant to collect funds for Arignar Anna’s Dravida Nadu weekly. I was made to stand on a table on that day as I was not tall enough. Even today I am standing on something, only instead of table I am standing on your shoulders. But, all of us are standing on Periyar’s shoulders which he has generously lent to all of us.
        The students of today are facing a formidable problem, as never before in the past. There is a concerted attempt to wean today’s students back to Manudharma days. There is a paradox. Computer on one side, website on the other. Facebook, What’s app, twitter, e-mail, e-publishing and what not. All these products of human intelligence are used against science with twisted ideas.
        The Dravidian Students’ Association was born out of a water pot containing drinking water. When the Dravidian students went to drink water from a water pot placed in the Government College, they were accosted by the Brahmins. “This pot is meant for us, Brahmins, and you should not touch this water, you born of a low caste,” they said.
        When the students came out of the high school to join colleges, they all came together, without any awareness of their caste. But once they entered the portals of Kumbakonam Government College, they were made to feel the ferocity of Manu Dharma. “No matter whether you are an undergraduate or post graduate, you belong to a low caste. We have kept a separate water pot for you and your like.” So, this water kept separately made them think.
        Many of you will be surprised to learn that not only the Dravidian Students’ Association, even Self Respect Movement was born out of water. Which was the library that Periyar got his knowledge from? Which Bodhi tree did he go in search of like Buddha, to acquire wisdom from? He got everything from his own experience.
        There was a rebel boy, who could not be controlled at home. He was E.V.Ramasamy. His parents thought the school might bring him under some control. But he could never cross fourth standard. In the school pupils used to go out for drinking water. Since there was no water pot in the school, he went to a house in the street and asked for water.
        It was a teacher’s house. The teacher belonged to a caste that was equivalent to that of boy Ramasamy. A girl brought water in a vessel and gave it to Ramasamy. When he was about to sip it, the woman said, “Don’t sip. Lift the vessel and pour water into your mouth.” When the boy Ramasamy tried to do so, water got into his nose and he was choked.
        When he put the vessel down, the woman brought water in another vessel and sprinkled it on the first one before taking it in. Next day, during recess, Ramasamy went to different house. The occupants belonged to a community which came lower to Ramasamy’s in caste hierarchy. “We should not give water to you. If we do so, your parents will take us into task.” The boy assured them he would not tell his parents, got water, and was about to pour it into his mouth, when the woman said, “No need. You can sip it.” When he gave the vessel back, she took it in without washing, which he noticed.
        This difference in their behaviour and treatment set him thinking. He remembered the women spoke of ‘caste’ and wondered why that was important when concern was all that was needed.
        A similar thinking was stirred at the Government College at Kumbakonam when the Brahmins prevented the low caste students from taking water from their pot. Finally, the low caste students broke the pot to assert their self respect. This reaction was the result of their having breathed Periyar. So, don’t ever forget that the tears of the Dravidian race was wiped off, starting with the water vessel incident in Periyar’s school days.
        That unparalleled free thinker of Periyar permitted the formation of a students’ forum, which, ultimately brought about such a revolution, and shaped many of the members to become rulers in future. It is precisely those who got trained in the students’ association brought about a great awakening in the Movement. Anna and Kalaignar M. Karunanidhi started thinking when they were in the student movement and finally ended up in Self Respect Movement.
        The students of today are facing a formidable problem, as never before in the past. There is a concerted attempt to wean today’s students back to Manudharma days. There is a paradox. Computer on one side, website on the other. Facebook, What’s app, twitter, e-mail, e-publishing and what not. All these products of human intelligence are used against science with twisted ideas. Hence it is not enough if you need Periyar. You must breathe him. Many students have joined Dravidian Students’ Association. It is estimated that more than 2000 of them are going to take part in today’s rally.
        I offer a tip to the old people who want to grow young. Exercises and tonic will not do. Move with people who are younger to you. Hold them tight and converse with them cheerfully. Periyar was a social scientist with no likes or dislikes of his own. He was against male domination. Though born in affluence he worried about those steeped in poverty. Though he was not born in a depressed family he was worried about the depressed, the oppressed, the marginalised and the exploited. Such a different person he was!
        Listen to his exhortation to students. He reminds them that their education is not merely for their comfortable living. He wants them to look at his fellow Dravidians, who are relegated as sudras and their country is considered a nation of melechas and human rights are deprived to its people, what did the divine people, the lords, the scholars, those in position and authorities do? Did they do anything to those people who caused so much of misery to their countrymen? Did they at least put an end to their activities or their tools? How can we people, who are their descendents, not be filled with a sense of shame?
        “But we are determined to execute the impossible, going against nature. The present is propitious enough for us. If we fail, no one can succeed. We have to strive no matter we win or lose. Wake up! Arise! Leave your private life behind! Instill our country with courage and pride. Raise the voice of self respect everywhere, in villages, hamlets, cities and suburbs. Belittle cowards and selfish wastrels! Let womenfolk become manly! Convert the lowly, the untouchables into first rate human! Don’t become family men before completing this task. Come to the battlefront” said Periyar on 15th April 1944.
        After Ayya and Amma, (E.V.R. Maniammiar) when I assumed their responsibility I used to say, “I don’t want any thinking of my own, what I received from Periyar is enough.” People made fun of me on that. My own thinking could be selfish, avaricious, defective or unrestrained. But Periyar’s thinking was always for the society and used to weigh everything with reason. People like me are proving useful to the Movement today because we painstakingly shaped ourselves in accordance with Periyar thought.
        Periyar uttered this guidelines in 1944. Only those people who came to this Movement after that, after Periyar and Anna, have succeeded in safeguarding the Movement after facing a number of tests and trials, changed the course of history and have brought about social revolution in the fields of education, employment and many other fields.
        But sanatana would not give up. It is five thousand year old venom. They ask whether the increase in the number of people going to the temples and new temples being built does not indicate that your policy and propaganda have failed? No they have not failed. Were there thefts of so many idols in those days? Was there a special squad for preventing idol theft? How did the need for them arise today? Why are all the deities going away? The High Court asks the Government and the police to protect the gods. If they require protection how can they be called gods?
        That is why Periyar said, ‘Forget God, Think of Human.’
        Usually people flatter students. Periyar was different. He scanned the youngsters through his scanner and said: Students are good soldiers, but not trained generals. They must therefore subject themselves to discipline as in the army. The soldiers must have understood this even before joining the army. Freedom and liberty are entirely different things. When stopped by a red traffic signal, no one must exercise his freedom. Please remember, freedom is not license, licence is not freedom. There is difference between restriction and freedom.
        “Just as parents are anxiously safeguarding their grown up daughter, students must protect their intellect and energy without expending them on wrong occasions,” said Periyar. This advice is as good in our computer age as it was in the age of mythology. Mobile phone is as intense an intoxicant as liquor, religion and power. Hence be resolute, be disciplined and be frugal, Periyar said.
        What do students gain when they join Dravidar Kazhagam, people may ask. There is no gain, only loss if you join us. What will you lose?
        You will lose your title of sudra and panchama which are marks of servility. Women’s servility will be lost. Superstition will run away, that is yet another loss. The conceit that makes you feel superior, caste distinctions and untouchability will be destroyed. That is one more loss. You will lose your chains that bind your hand and legs and even your intellect, and your mental aberrations will be cured, if you become rationalists. There is one more point you must enlighten yourselves on. The Dravidian Movement representing non Brahmins was born in 1944. But Dravidian Students’ Association was born in 1943, a year earlier. From then on people keep asking, “Why this name Dravidian? Why can’t we call ourselves Tamils?”
        A Tamil gets his name though his language. Dravidian is the name of the race. Everyone who speaks Tamil language can be a Tamil, but not a Dravidian. One who is Dravidian by race can be called a Dravidian in spite of his religion and language.
        Even a Brahmin can call himself a Tamil, mingle with us and scheme against us. But no Brahmin will ever call himself a Dravidian. Even if he comes forward to do so, he will have to give up all his customs, rituals, conceit and accept the Dravidian way of life.
        What is the difference between Dravidianism and Aryanism?
        Dravidianism says, All are equal by birth. Aryanism believes in Varnasrama and caste division.
        Dravidianism gives prominence to reason and nationality.
        Aryanism says, Believe, do not question. If you refuse to believe you will end up in hall.
        Dravidian has unyielding confidence. “I can do anything”.
        Aryanism shrinks in cowardice. “Nothing is in my hands”.
        Dravidianism says, if you err you are sure to be punished.
        Aryanism assures expiation, and encourages people to commit wrong deeds.
        Dravidianism glorifies farmers as fundamental to the society.
        Aryanism considers farming a sinful occupation.
        Dravidianism insists on education to everyone.
        Aryanism denies it to the sudras and low caste people.
        Dravidianism is after heroic victories.
        Aryanism tries to succeed through short cuts.
        Dravidianism says, All for each.
        Aryanism says, To everyone what is fixed for him / her.
        Hence, work for the welfare of the Dravidians, Be steadfast, be fearless!
        We will breathe Periyar and attain Prosperity.
        By | on August 1, 2018 Logo